Hey, I can’t seem to leave this topic alone! I’ve been thinking about the subject nonstop not to mention, Alister Cameron’s article which I linked to the other day sure did provide some food for thought, especially when it comes to child themes.
Based on everything I’ve read throughout the comments and what have you, there are two things that have become clear. The first is, it is perfectly acceptable under the GPL to charge for a WordPress theme, or WordPress itself if you really wanted to. The second, placing any sort of restrictions on a WordPress theme automatically makes the theme violate the GPL. While I’m no GPL expert, those two facts have been made clear to me.
With that in mind, that makes me wonder how the hell premium theme authors have been doing business selling themes with single use or multi-use licenses all this time. Considering that under the GPL, nothing stops someone from redistributing the php files for free. This puzzles me because I would have thought by now, the premium theme market would have been killed off thanks in part to people redistributing these themes for free.
So, the next stick in the spokes is themes that were removed because the link within them pointed back to a site that either sold premium themes that were not GPL or contained advertising for sites that participated in releasing GPL violated material. For those of you who maintain a WordPress related website, will you be making the move to remove advertising for companies that do not adhere to the GPL? If you don’t, by the looks of things, you won’t be getting any support from Matt or anyone involved with the WordPress project. But then, those who sell premium themes and operate their business are the ones who spend money on advertising. I can’t think of a theme author who releases fully compliant GPL themes who would spend money on advertising for their theme or business of releasing free themes. Why bother when they could just upload it to the theme repository. Ok, so lets connect the circle in that, if the major WordPress community websites decide to align themselves with Matt’s thoughts and GPL compliance guidelines and then they drop the advertising for businesses that sell themes which violate the GPL, could this mean that all premium theme businesses throw out the single license/multi-license business model and go the Brian Gardner route or some other route just as long as they are fully GPL compliant?
Based on previous run ins with Matt and his answers to specific questions at various WordCamps, it’s pretty obvious that he would like to see premium theme authors do business in the way WordPress.com does. That is, embrace the spirit of GPL by releasing your work under the license and build a business around the value of that work. It is also obvious that Matt and Toni fully support the way Brian Gardner and Jason Schuller are running their business. So if you’re a business that has been built on the model of selling the entire theme (php files, css and images) for single-use or multi site licenses and then stating that the theme can not be redistributed, now might be a good time to either think of a new way of doing business that is completely in line with GPL and Matt’s way of thinking or, do things your own way while not counting on support from the WordPress project.
What could this all mean for the average Joe? For starters, if those who make a living selling an entire theme switch over to releasing their work for free, the WordPress community as a whole will benefit by having access to some kick ass themes. It’s been proven before that not everyone who uses WordPress knows what they are doing and so, if you need support for a particular theme, be prepared to pony up some cash. Premium theme authors will compete amongst each other by way of design, ease of use, customizations, various style sheets, image sets, theme clubs, support, consultation services, etc. Alister makes a great point in that, perhaps
The issue is that most of us have not thought creatively enough about how to both honour the GPL and make money.
I’ve already listed a couple of elements that theme authors could charge for but how about another. I can easily see a creative premium theme author starting their own theme marketplace. The premium theme author creates a base package and then, that theme author can use their marketplace for their specific themes as an affiliate type of marketplace. Basically, if I really enjoy your theme but I have edited the CSS to change the look or feel of the theme and visitors to my site are asking me what I did to achieve that look because they want it to, I could sign up for your marketplace, upload my customized CSS file for that specific theme, give it a price of my choosing and realize that a portion of money I make from anyone who purchases that customization will go back to the marketplace owner. I realize that a customized CSS file might be a bad example considering how easy it is to copy someones CSS file but I think I got the idea across. That’s funny, that idea sounds a little bit like the Theme Marketplace idea that Automattic was thinking of doing.
I don’t speak for Matt or anyone involved with the project. These are all my thoughts and opinions on the matter.